Is the square a rectangle?

  • Orlando Aya Corredor Magister en docencia de la Matemática, profesor auxiliar Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
  • Armando Echeverry Gaitán Magister en docencia de la Matemática, profesor Secretaria de Educación del Distrito.
  • Carmen Samper Magister en Matemáticas, profesora Emérita Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
Keywords: Conceptualization, construction of definitions, dynamic geometry, hierarchic definitions.

Abstract

The concept of a geometric object occurs, among other things, because of experiences on such object. The hypothesis of this study, is that performing a conceptualization process of an object, using a surrounding of dynamic geometry, helps not only to state, formalize and structure hierarchic and economic definitions of objects, but also to establish the definition used by the students working in a context of demonstrative activity. In supporting the hypothesis, sessions of classes of two consecutive academic spaces, of a teacher initial formation program, and a questionnaire applied to the students, were analyzed. The study sought evidences which lead, supported on the theoretic framework that guided the study, to determine the impact of working in a surrounding, where a software of dynamic geometry is used, as a mediator for learning. The results led to establish, among other things, that the work performed with dynamic geometry should be accompanied by intentioned actions guide by the teacher. It was proved that, even after using dynamic geometry, difficulties continue appear regarding the concept of the square geometric object, as predominance of figure aspects on conceptual ones, and difficulty to modify personal definitions of the concept and conceptual images, surged when the students realize any demonstrative activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Calvo, C. (2001). Un estudio sobre el papel de las definiciones y las demostraciones en cursos preuniversitarios de Cálculo Diferencial e Integral. (Tesis Doctoral). Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Departamento de Didáctica de las Matemáticas y de las Ciencias Experimentales.

de Villiers, M. (1986). The Role of Axiomatisation in Mathematics and Mathematics Teaching. Research Unit for Mathematics Education. South Africa: University of Stellenbosch.

de Villiers, M. (1998). ¿To Teach Definitions In Geometry Or Teach To Define? In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds), Proceedings of the Twenty-second International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education: University of Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch, 12-17 July 1998. (2), 248-255.

de Villiers, M. (2004). Using dynamic geometry to expand mathematics teachers’ understanding of proof. Mathematics Education, University of Durban-Westville, South Africa, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 5 (35), 703–724.

Fischbein, E. (1993) La teoría de los conceptos figurales. Traducción de Víctor Larios Osorios; tomada de versión original En: EducationalStudies in Mathematics 24 (2): 139-162.

Furinghetti, F. & Paola, D. (2000). Definition As A Teaching Object: A Preliminary Study. Nakahara & Okayama (Eds.). Proceedings of PME 24 (Hiroshima). 2, 289-296.

Furinghetti, F. & Paola, D. (2002). Defining Within A Dynamic Geometry Enviroment: Notes From The Classroom. Cockburn A. D. & Nardi E. (Eds.). Proceedings of PME 26 (Norwich). 2, 392-399.

Govender, R. (2002). Constructive Evaluation Of Definitions In A Sketchpad Context, Paper presented at AMESA 2002, 1-5 July 2002, Univ. Natal, Durban, South Africa Dept. of Education & Culture, Teaching & Learning Services – Mathematics Michael de Villiers Mathematics Education, Univ. Durban-Westville.

Healy, L.(2000) Identifying and explaining geometrical relationship: Interactions with robust and soft Cabri constructions. En T Nakahara y M Koyama (eds.) Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the International Group of Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 103-117) Hiroshima University.

Jones, K. (2000). Providing a foundation for deductive reasoning: students’ interpretations when using dynamic geometry software and their evolving mathematical explanations. Educational studies in mathematics. 44, 55-85.

Mariotti, M; (1997). Justifying and Proving in Geometry: the mediation of a microworld. Hejny M., Novotna J. (eds.) Proceedings of the European Conference on Mathematical Education. Prague. pp. 21-26.

Mariotti, M; Fischbein, E;(1997). Defining in classroom activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics 34: 219-248.

Perry P., Camargo L., Samper C, Rojas C. (2006). Actividad demostrativa en la formación inicial del profesor de matemáticas. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Bogotá: Editorial Nomos S.A.

Tall, D. et al. (2002). Advanced Mathematical Thinking. A.J. Bishop Managing Editor. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Zazkis, R., Leikin R., (2008). Exemplifying definitions: a case of a square. Springer Science. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, p. 131.

Published
2016-02-27
How to Cite
Aya Corredor, O., Echeverry Gaitán, A., & Samper, C. (2016). Is the square a rectangle?. Sophia, 12(1), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.18634/sophiaj.12v.1i.451
Section
Artículos de investigación en Pedagogía