Students’ entry profile to the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences at the Central University of Ecuador

  • Sebastian Gonzalo Yanez Segovia Universidad central del acuador
  • Ramiro José Vivas Vivas
  • Jorge Simón Pérez de Corcho
Keywords: Interdisciplinary approach, active learning, methodology, motivation.

Abstract

In this article, we study the students’ entry profile to the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences at the Central University of Ecuador, through the analysis of strategies, motives and learning approaches that model students’ behavior and influence their performance. The lack of interest and the documents published around the Agricultural Sciences give emphasis to experimental research, leaving educational research relegated, resulting in few studies on the subject at national and international level. It was applied, in a virtual and voluntary way, the Study Process Questionnaire - Revised R-SPQ-2F. The population was composed by 80 students of Agricultural Engineering, and 20 students of Ecological Tourism. The learning approaches were related to extra-curricular factors, such as the career, gender and the study level of their parents. The results show that the majority of students prefer a superficial approach, which is based on extrinsic motivation, and that bets on rote learning. No relevant relationship was found between the learning approach and extracurricular factors; however, students with parents with the highest educational level present the most superficial approach. The above points out that the objective of the students is to approve their studies, even though this imply obtaining the minimum qualifications. It is concluded that it is essential to know the profile of the students at entry, with the purpose of implementing methods and methodologies to achieve meaningful learning, and to prevent failure and student desertion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sebastian Gonzalo Yanez Segovia, Universidad central del acuador
ESPECIALISTA EN ENTOMOLOGIA, ECOLOGIA DE POBLACION, ESTADISTICA.DOCENTE UNIVERSITARIO

References

Araujo, S. (2016). Tradiciones de enseñanza, enfoques de aprendizaje y evaluación: dos puntos de vista, dos modos de actuación. Trayectorias Universitarias, 2(2):3-10.

Barca, A; Seijas, S; Brenlla, J; Santamaría, S; Barreiro, A (1999). La escala CEPEA: un instrumento para la evaluación de los procesos y estrategias de aprendizaje en estudiantes de educación superior. Revista Galego-Portuguesa de Psicología e Educación 5(1), 325-341.

Barca, A. (2002). Los Contextos de Aprendizaje y Desarrollo en la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Perspectivas de Intervención Psicoeducativa sobre el fracaso escolar en La comunidad autónoma de Galicia Proyecto Feder/Esog-Galicia: 1fd97-0283. Universidad de la Coruña. España.

Biggs, J. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.

Biggs, J. (1988). Assessing study approaches to learning. Australian Psychologist, 23: 197-206.

Biggs, J.; Kember, D.; Leung, D. (2001): The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: RSPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71: 133-149.

Entwistle, N. (1988). Motivational factors in student's approaches to learning. In: Schmeck, R. (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles. Nueva York: Plenum Press.

Entwistle, N.; Tait, H.; Mc Cune, V. (2001). Patterns of response to approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of the Psychology of Education, 15(1): 33-48.

García, M. (2016). ¿Cómo aprenden los alumnos en su primer año de universidad al inicio y al final del curso? REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 14(1): 27-49.

García, H., De la Hoz, G. (2015). Enfoques de aprendizaje en los estudiantes de Medicina de una universidad en la ciudad de Cali (Colombia). En Revista Educación y Humanismo, 17(28), 38-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.17.28.1165

Gargallo, B., Suárez, J., García, E., Pérez, C., Sahuquillo, P. (2012). Enfoques de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios excelentes y en estudiantes medios. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 70(252): 185-200

Gijbels, D.; Van de Watering, G.; Dochy, F.; Van den Bossche, P. (2005). The relationship between students approaches to learning and learning outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(4): 327-341

Herrera, L., Lorenzo, O. (2009). Estrategias de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios. Un aporte a la construcción del Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. Educación y Educadores, 12 (3): 75-98.

Knowles, M. (1984). Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Martin, F.; Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative Differences in Learning: I Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: 4-11.

Merriam, S.; Mohamad, M. (2000). How cultural values shape learning in older adulthood: The case of Malaysia. Adult Education Quarterly, 51(1): 45 – 63.

Mirete, A., Soro, M., Maquilón, J. (2015). El fracaso escolar y los enfoques de aprendizaje: medidas para la inclusión educativa. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 18(3), 183-196. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/reifop.18.3.239021

Nordin, N.; Abdul, R.; Ainuddin, N. (2013). Approaches to Learning among Trainee Teachers: Malaysian Experiences. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105: 284 - 293.

Richardson, J. (2000). Researching student learning: Approaches to studying in campus-based and distance education. British Educational Research Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press.

Riveros, E., Bernal, M., Gonzalez, N. (2011). Prevalencia de los enfoques de aprendizaje en estudiantes de Fisiología Médica: cuestionario de proceso de estudio revisado de dos factores (R-SPQ-2F). Biosalud, 10(2): 37-47.

Salim, R., Lotti de Santos, M. (2011). Evaluación de enfoques, motivaciones y estrategias de aprendizaje en estudiantes del primer año universitario de Odontología (UNT). Cuadernos de Educación, 9: 245-260

Severiens, S., Dam, T. (1998). Gender and Learning: Comparing two theories. Higher Education, 35: 329-350.

Shaari, R., Mahmud, N., Wahab, S., Rahim, K., Rajab, A., Saat, M., Rahman, H., Panatik, S., Rahman, A., Yusoff, R. (2011). A study on learning approaches used among post graduate students in a research university. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 3 (2).

Tait, H.; Entwistle, N.; Mc Cune, V. (1998). A reconceptualisation of the approaches and study skills inventory. In: Rust (ed.) Improving students as learners. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University, The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, 262-271.

Valle, A., González, R., Núñez, J., Suárez, J., Piñeiro, I., Rodríguez, S. (2000). Enfoques de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios. Psicothema, (12)3: 368-375.

Watkins, D. (2003). Student learning: A cross cultural perspective. In: International Handbook of Educational Research in the Asia-Pacific Region. John P. Keeves and Ryo Watanabe (eds.). Dorcrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 441-462.

Wilding, J., Andrews, B. (2006). Life goals, approaches to study and performance in an undergraduate cohort. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76: 171-182.

Published
2018-07-31
How to Cite
Yanez Segovia, S. G., Vivas Vivas, R. J., & Pérez de Corcho, J. S. (2018). Students’ entry profile to the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences at the Central University of Ecuador. Sophia, 14(2), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.18634/sophiaj.14v.2i.517
Section
Artículos de investigación